01
Write the workflow as decisions
Explain when to ask for a plan, when to run tests, how to review a diff, and which actions need human approval. Avoid presenting a prompt as a substitute for engineering judgment.
← Read the publishing guide
SaveKit use case
Publish an AI Coding Workflow Page for Your Team
Teams often need a short, practical page for how they use coding assistants: what context to provide, how to review changes, and where humans must make the final decision. A static page is enough for many small workflows.
A good fit for: AI coding playbooks, prompt checklists, repository conventions, onboarding notes, and team experiments.
02
Package the page
Use one HTML file for a compact checklist or a ZIP for a richer guide with diagrams and examples. Remove repository secrets and private issue links.
03
Invite focused feedback
Share the page with a team or community and ask which step is ambiguous, expensive, or missing. Update the same guide as the workflow changes.
Before you publish
A quick static-site checklist
These checks prevent the most common surprises after a folder becomes a public URL.
- Private repository data is removed
- Review and testing steps are explicit
- Examples are clearly illustrative
- The page names its last updated date
Common questions
What to know before using a static host
Can I use a coding assistant to generate the page?
Yes. Review the generated instructions, links, code examples, and security guidance before publishing them.
Is a static page suitable for internal documentation?
It can be useful for a small, read-mostly workflow. Use an authenticated documentation system when the content is confidential or needs granular access control.
How do I keep the workflow current?
Add a visible update date, keep the page in version control, and republish when tools or review rules change.
Have a page ready to share?
Upload the HTML or ZIP build, preview it, and get a link you can send to the next person who needs to see it.
Start publishing